Comprehensive Guide to SNS vs SQS: Understanding Critical Differences, Use Cases, Advantages & Alternatives

If you're considering implementing a message queuing service for your business, you may wonder which system best fits your needs. Both AWS Simple Notification Service (SNS) and AWS Simple Queue Service (SQS) are highly reliable and scalable messaging services offered by AWS Web Services (AWS).

‍

However, they have different design goals and use cases. Understanding the differences between them is essential to make an informed decision about which is right for your business.

‍

This article will provide an overview of SNS and SQS and compare their features, pricing, and use cases to help you determine which system is the best fit for your business.

Introduction to SNS

AWS Simple Notification Service (SNS) is a fully managed messaging service that enables you to send notifications or messages to a large number of subscribers or other applications.

‍

SNS makes it easy to send messages to multiple endpoints (such as email addresses, mobile phone numbers, and AWS Lambda functions) with a single API call. It is a push-based delivery system that sends messages to its subscribers as soon as they are published.

‍

It is often used as a building block for event-driven architectures, microservices, and serverless applications. It can send alerts, notifications, or other types of information to multiple recipients in real time.

‍

It is highly scalable, with no upfront costs or minimum fees, and it can handle a high volume of messages without losing performance. It is also highly available, with built-in fault tolerance and automatic retries.

‍

It is a flexible messaging service that can be used in various scenarios, including sending SMS messages, email notifications, triggering Lambda functions, and fan-out messaging to other services. It is a simple and cost-effective way to send messages to a large number of recipients in a reliable and scalable manner.

‍

Introduction to SQS

AWS Simple Queue Service (SQS) is a fully managed message queuing service that enables you to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications.

‍

It provides a message-oriented middleware service that allows you to send, store, and receive messages between software components at any scale.

‍

It is a pull-based delivery system, which means that messages are not automatically pushed to the consumers. Instead, consumers must retrieve messages from the queue manually. This design allows SQS to provide high availability and flexibility, as consumers can choose when and how often to retrieve messages.

‍

SQS offers two types of queues: standard queues and FIFO (First-In, First-Out) queues.

‍

Standard queues offer best-effort delivery, while FIFO queues guarantee that messages are processed in the order they are sent and without duplicates. 

‍

It is a reliable and scalable messaging service that can handle a high volume of messages without losing performance. It is also highly available, with built-in fault tolerance and automatic retries.

‍

SQS is often used to decouple and scale applications, integrate applications using message-based communication, and provide a reliable and scalable way to communicate between distributed systems. It is a simple and cost-effective way to send, store, and receive messages at any scale.

‍

Advantages of SQS and SNS

AWS Simple Queue Service (SQS) and AWS Simple Notification Service (SNS) are both highly reliable and scalable messaging services offered by AWS Web Services (AWS). Both services have the following advantages:

Scalability

They are designed to scale horizontally and can handle a high volume of messages without losing performance.

‍

Reliability

They are fully managed services that are highly available, with built-in fault tolerance and automatic retries.

‍

Security

They offer secure communication using SSL/TLS, and you can use AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to set up fine-grained access controls.

‍

Integration

They can be easily integrated with other AWS services and third-party services.

‍

Cost-effectiveness

They are pay-as-you-go services with no upfront costs or minimum fees. You only pay for the number of requests and the data transferred.

‍

Simplicity

They are simple and easy-to-use messaging services that require minimal setup and maintenance. In summary, both SQS and SNS are reliable and scalable messaging services that can be used in various scenarios.

‍

However, they have different design goals and use cases. Understanding the differences between them is essential to make an informed decision about which is right for your business.

‍

Understanding Critical Differences in SNS vs SQS

AWS Simple Notification Service (SNS) and AWS Simple Queue Service (SQS) have different design goals. They use cases, and it's essential to understand the primary differences between them to make an informed decision about which is right for your business.

SNS vs SQS: Primary Differences

Delivery model:

SNS is a push-based delivery system that sends messages to its subscribers as soon as they are published, while SQS is a pull-based delivery system in which consumers must retrieve messages from the queue manually.

‍

Subscribers:

SNS allows you to send messages to multiple endpoints (such as email addresses, mobile phone numbers, and AWS Lambda functions) with a single API call. At the same time, SQS does not have subscribers, and messages are retrieved from the queue by consumers.

‍

Protocols:

SNS supports multiple protocols, including understanding, while SQS only supports a custom protocol based on HTTP/HTTPS.

‍

Ordering:

SNS does not guarantee the order of delivery for messages, while SQS offers two types of queues: standard queues and FIFO (First-In, First-Out) queues, which ensure that messages are processed in the order they are sent and without duplicates.

‍

Use cases:

SNS is often used as a building block for event-driven architectures, micro services, and serverless applications.

‍

SQS is often used to decouple and scale applications, integrate applications using message-based communication, and provide a reliable and scalable way to communicate between distributed systems.

‍‍

SNS vs SQS: Tabular Comparison

Here is a tabular comparison of AWS Simple Notification Service (SNS) and AWS Simple Queue Service (SQS):

{{snstable="/components"}}

SNS vs SQS: Use Cases (Practical Examples)

Here are some practical examples of use cases for AWS Simple Notification Service (SNS) and AWS Simple Queue Service (SQS):

‍

SQS: Processing commands in the right order:

You can use SQS in scenarios where the order of events (and the order of processing them) is essential.

‍

For example, a system that receives multiple commands from a user and has multiple threads that can process them. An SQS can ensure that the user-entered commands are executed in the right order and that the previous command's output can be used as input for the next.

‍

SNS: Distributing messages to multiple subscribers:

You can use SNS in scenarios where multiple subscribers receive the same message and process it according to their responsibilities/capabilities simultaneously.

‍

For example, a food ordering app can generate order confirmation messages that can then be distributed via SNS to the pickup and delivery boy (on their mobile), the kitchen manager (on their tablet), the bookkeeper (on their desktop), and the business intelligence and analytics tool (via an API or database call). These subscribers can then move ahead and fulfill their duties to achieve the final goal.

‍

SQS: Integrating applications using message-based communication:

You can use SQS to integrate applications using message-based communication. This can be useful for building loosely coupled systems that can communicate with each other using messages without the need for direct integration.

‍

SNS: Fan-out messaging to other services:

You can use SNS to fan-out messages to multiple endpoints with a single API call. This can be useful for distributing messages to a large number of subscribers or other applications in a reliable and scalable manner.

‍

SNS: Triggering Lambda functions:

You can use SNS to trigger Lambda functions in response to events. This can be useful for building event-driven architectures, where you can use SNS to send messages to Lambda functions that perform various tasks, such as processing data, sending notifications, or integrating with other services.

‍

SQS: Decoupling microservices:

You can use SQS to decouple your microservices and make them more resilient to failures. SQS allows you to send messages between services in a reliable and scalable manner to build a more flexible and scalable architecture.

‍

SNS vs SQS: Sample Cooperative Scenarios

SNS + SQS: Fan-out messaging to multiple processors:

You can use SNS to fan-out messages to multiple processors that are subscribed to the topic and use SQS to process the messages in a reliable and scalable manner. This can be useful for distributing workloads across multiple processors and achieving parallel processing.

‍

SNS + Lambda: Event-driven processing:

You can use SNS to trigger Lambda functions in response to events and use the Lambda functions to perform various tasks, such as processing data, sending notifications, or integrating with other services. This can be useful for building event-driven architectures that are scalable and flexible.

‍

SQS + Lambda: Asynchronous processing:

You can use SQS to queue up tasks that need to be performed asynchronously and use Lambda functions to process the tasks in a scalable and reliable manner. This can be useful for decoupling microservices and building resilient systems.

‍

SNS + SQS + Lambda: Fan-out messaging to multiple processors with event-driven processing:

You can use SNS to fan-out messages to multiple processors that are subscribed to the topic, use SQS to process the messages in a reliable and scalable manner, and use Lambda functions to perform various tasks in response to events.

‍

This can be a powerful combination for building complex and scalable systems.

‍

SNS and SQS can be used together in cooperative scenarios to achieve a range of goals, such as fan-out messaging, event-driven processing, and asynchronous processing.

‍

When to Use SNS?

You should consider using AWS Simple Notification Service (SNS) in the following scenarios:

‍

Sending notifications or messages to a large number of subscribers:

SNS allows you to send notifications or messages to multiple endpoints (such as email addresses, mobile phone numbers, and AWS Lambda functions) with a single API call.

‍

This makes it an ideal choice for sending alerts, notifications, or other types of information to a large number of subscribers in real time.

‍

Building event-driven architectures:

SNS is often used as a building block for event-driven architectures, where it can be used to send messages to Lambda functions that perform various tasks in response to events.

‍

This can be useful for building scalable and flexible systems that can react to environmental changes.

‍

Fan-out messaging to multiple recipients:

SNS can distribute messages to multiple recipients with a single API call. This can be useful for distributing workloads across multiple processors and achieving parallel processing.

‍

Integrating with other services:

SNS can be easily integrated with other AWS services and third-party services using multiple protocols (such as HTTP, HTTPS, SMS, and email). This makes it an ideal choice for integrating applications using message-based communication.

‍

When to Use SQS?

You should consider using AWS Simple Queue Service (SQS) in the following scenarios:

‍

Decoupling and scaling applications:

SQS allows you to decouple microservices and make them more resilient to failures. It provides a reliable and scalable way to send messages between services, which can help you build a more flexible and scalable architecture.

‍

Integrating applications using message-based communication:

SQS can be used to integrate applications using message-based communication. This can be useful for building loosely coupled systems that communicate with each other using messages without requiring direct integration.

‍

Providing a reliable and scalable way to communicate between distributed systems:

SQS can be used to provide a reliable and scalable way to communicate between distributed systems. It allows you to send messages between services in a reliable and scalable manner, which can help you build resilient systems.

‍

Processing messages in the right order:

SQS offers two types of queues: standard queues and FIFO (First-In, First-Out) queues. FIFO queues guarantee that messages are processed in the order they are sent and without duplicates, which can be helpful in scenarios where the order of events is essential.

‍

Asynchronous processing:

SQS can queue up tasks that need to be performed asynchronously. This can be useful for decoupling microservices and building resilient systems.

‍

When to use SNS and SQS together?

You should consider using AWS Simple Notification Service (SNS) and AWS Simple Queue Service (SQS) together in the following scenarios:

‍

Fan-out messaging to multiple processors:

You can use SNS to fan-out messages to multiple processors that are subscribed to the topic and use SQS to process the messages in a reliable and scalable manner.

‍

This can be useful for distributing workloads across multiple processors and achieving parallel processing.

‍

Event-driven processing:

You can use SNS to trigger Lambda functions in response to events and use the Lambda functions to perform various tasks.

‍

You can also use SQS to queue up tasks that need to be performed asynchronously and use Lambda functions to process the tasks in a scalable and reliable manner.

‍

Fan-out messaging to multiple processors with event-driven processing:

You can use SNS to fan-out messages to multiple processors that are subscribed to the topic, use SQS to process the messages in a reliable and scalable manner, and use Lambda functions to perform various tasks in response to events.

‍

This can be a powerful combination for building complex and scalable systems.

‍

What are Other Alternatives Out There?

Various messaging services are available that can be used for multiple purposes, such as sending notifications or messages, integrating applications, and building event-driven architectures. Some popular alternatives to AWS Simple Notification Service (SNS) and AWS Simple Queue Service (SQS) include:

‍

1) Boltic:

Boltic is a fully-managed messaging service that allows you to send and receive messages between applications, services, and devices.

‍

It provides a reliable and scalable way to send messages between systems and can be used to decouple micro services, integrate applications, and build event-driven architectures.

‍

Boltic is also highly scalable, with the ability to handle millions of messages per second, and it is fully managed, so you don't have to worry about maintaining the infrastructure.

‍

Boltic also offers a range of features that can help you to integrate your data for analysis. It has built-in support for data transformation, which allows you to convert data from one format to another, and it supports various data formats, including JSON, XML, and CSV.

‍

Boltic also has integrations with popular data storage and analysis tools, such as AWS S3 and AWS Redshift, which makes it easy to store and analyze your data.

‍

Boltic is a powerful and easy-to-use messaging service that can help you to integrate your data for analysis and achieve a range of goals.

‍

Boltic can provide the reliability, scalability, and flexibility you need to succeed, whether you are building microservices, integrating applications, or building event-driven architectures.

‍

2) Google Cloud Pub/Sub:

This fully-managed messaging service allows you to send and receive messages between independent applications. It can be used for real-time streaming, data integration, and event-driven architectures.

‍

3) Azure Service Bus:

This is a fully-managed messaging service that allows you to send and receive messages between applications, services, and devices. It can be used for decoupling microservices, integrating applications, and building event-driven architectures.

‍

Conclusion

Both SNS and SQS are fully managed and highly scalable, making them ideal for a wide range of use cases.

‍

SNS is best suited for scenarios where you need to send notifications or messages to a large number of subscribers, build event-driven architectures or fan-out messages to multiple recipients.

‍

SQS is best suited for scenarios where you need to decouple micro services, integrate applications using message-based communication, provide a reliable and scalable way to communicate between distributed systems, process messages in the right order, or perform asynchronous processing.

‍

In addition to SNS and SQS, a variety of other messaging services available can be used to achieve similar goals. Boltic is one such service that is fully managed and easy to use and can help you to integrate your data for analysis.

‍

Ultimately, the exemplary messaging service for your business will depend on your specific needs and goals. By considering the advantages and limitations of each service, you can choose the one that is best suited to your requirements.

‍